|
The
Perfect Coffee Table Book?
Why
are 'coffee table books' called 'coffee table books'? As
chronically underfurnitured person I have never been able to
answer that question to my satisfaction. So the problem still
stands. Even with the arrival of 'Ansel Adams At 100'. Now I get
the idea though.
Do
you like to work out?
'sorry,
wrong wording - let's try it again'.
Would
you like to work out, but still haven't got the equipment
together? You actually were about to get you something to help
you get rid of that holiday fat, weren't you! Well, the search
is over (TADA!) - the perfect gift for you has just
arrived! 'Ansel Adams At 100'! With 'Ansel Adams At 100' these
pesky pounds will be gone in no time! Until
the completion of the complimentary exercise video we recommend
to use the item in more orthodox ways though - for example in
connection with a coffee table.
On second thought - better make it two (coffee tables) because
you'll need something to support the Slip In Case (which is very
much a piece of furniture itself) during your read.
So then, there you are! No! No coffee right now, thank you!
First because I doubt that there's any room left for the mug and
second ' if you spill something on that fancy linen cover you
pretty much did it! Your trusty 'Bounce' wipe won't help here
and perhaps the lady from the local Laundromat would look a
little worried, if you'd drop a stained Ansel book on her
counter ' 'for dry cleaning please!'
Who
is John Szarkowski?
In
the unlikely event, that you shouldn't know - the back flap
won't enlighten you (one might say 'it couldn't be woven in'),
neither will you find some explanation anywhere within the book.
Anyway, let's just say he wrote the essay and directed the
production. That's my guess at least, partly because he is
credited and mostly because this Ansel volume looks so very
different from the last efforts of Little, Brown & Co. -
like 'Ansel Adams In Color' and 'Ansel Adams' California'. In
case you haven't heard of the publishers either - they're the
ones that accompany their Adams editions with the sentence: ...'Only
such works published by Little, Brown and Company can be considered
authentic representations of the genius of Ansel Adams.'
Thanks for reminding me! Otherwise I might have just thought
that lately the foremost goal is to cash in ('Ansel Adams In
Color'???, I wonder how long it'll take until there's something
like 'San Francisco's most beautiful intersections, photographed
by Ansel Adams'...).
But back to the author.
I do like Mr. Szarkowski's prose very much. His style
then as now is deceptively simple, surprisingly perceptive and
often ironically detached. He doesn't engage in any worship
either. Very much a city man (and perhaps a little under the
influence of the annual Sierra Club Calendars) he always made it
plain that he: 'distrust(s) pictures as radiant and untroubled
as this one, especially if that picture is a photograph' [John
Szarkowski: Atget, The Museum Of Modern Art and Callaway, 2000].
This distrust seems to help him to maintain a kind of healthy
emotional distance to Adams' work what makes his introductions
to those books a worthwhile read in itself. Even so, 'Ansel
Adams At 100' seems to be already (if my count is correct) the
third collaboration between Szarkowski and 'Little, Brown &
Co.' on the photographer. The third and certainly the heaviest
to date.
'The king
is dead. Long live the king!' (The Illustrations)
Since he hung up
his reins in the photo department of MOMA John Szarkowski has
continued to bring photography to the people. In 'Ansel Adams At
100' in the best royal style, by not giving the people what they
want, but pretty much what he wants them to want. This makes for
a refreshing change in the publisher's catalogue, but is of
course subject to interpretation. Szarkowski clearly prefers
Ansel's detail work mostly done in the 1930s and groups it in a
way that you feel occasionally the strange sensation of browsing
through a Weston catalogue. The prints selected are also rather
personal - there is some popular Adams, but not much. Most of
selections are unknown and some even undeservedly so, but it is
definitely not (and not intended to be) a 'Best Of Adams'. The
same counts for the some of the printed versions reproduced.
Ansel printed with increasing contrast towards the 1970s and
John Szarkowski doesn't seem to like that very much - at least
he tends to prefer the softer versions done in years before (not
always, but mostly). I for my part am much a member of the high
contrast fraction, so obviously my choice would have been
different - then again, so would be the ones of the odd dozen
people one might ask. In all fairness he does show in two cases
the 'before' and 'afters' (even if they are from different
negatives as in 'Mount McKinley and Wonder Lake'), so that you
can make up your own mind if you are interested.
Conclusion
I think the book is
a great achievement. For the publishing house that showed that
they still can do it, for the editor that showed it once more
and for the customer that gets it all handsomely presented in a
surprise package. What more could you want?
Rating
on the 8x10' film holder scale
out of 4
©
Joerg Frankenberger 2001
Other
books by John Szarkowski:
Looking At Photographs: 100 Photographs From The Collection Of
MOMA, Bulfinch, 1973 (1999)
Yosemite
And The High Sierra (Ansel Adams), Little, Brown & Co., 1994
Atget,
The Museum Of Modern Art and Callaway, 2000
|